Hi Phil,
Could you share some additional info? This certainly sounds like either a
misconfiguration or a bug, but without additional info, it's very hard to
diagnose.
Helpful info would include:
JUNOS version
relevant config snippets from the Juniper RP and Cisco first-hop routers
'show pim rps extensive'
'show pim statistics'
'show system processes extensive'
'show system statistics'
PFE process and traffic statistics
'start shell pfe network <cfeb0|fpxX>'
'ps'
'show pfe statistics traffic'
--Stacy
On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:35 AM, Philip Palanchi wrote:
> We're seeing what seems to be an interoperability problem when we configure
> PIM Sparse-mode Rendezvous Point on either m10i or mx240 and the PIM source
> registration messages are coming from cisco routers where the cfeb's, fpc's
> and dpc's go to 100% cpu utilization all the time. The box stops responding
> to snmp management, but multicast seems to work ok.
>
> It seems to be that the pd interface on the RP isn't de-capsulating the
> register messages. JTAC said the pe interface on the encapsulating routers
> needs a tunnel services PIC but our edge routers are all cisco. Any
> suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
