On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 10:09:00 pm [email protected] wrote:
> May be the point is about the maximums about > logical-interfaces, instances, sessions, etc etc because > T-Series is more oriented to core applications, and > M-Series are Edge-Service routers, no matter the > throughput. One difference I know is that the T320 has different 'hash- key' support for 'family multiservice' support when compared to the M320, i.e., the M320 gives you more capability. Apart from that, and the lack of AC PSU's, it's not that different from the M320, although I'd probably never consider buying either of them and just take an MX for Ethernet and a Cisco ASR for non-Ethernet. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
