Haven't touched 10.4 yet, but 10.0R3.10 has been very solid for us in what sounds to be a similar environment. Mostly L2VPNs here, with some VPLS (BGP and LDP) and VRF thrown in on MXs (240/480) and T640s (full table on all of them, in a VRF), 2 of which are acting as RRs in a limited capacity. Been running it since June 2010 without a single issue (something I haven't been able to say of earlier versions for a few years now).
D On 15 March 2011 02:13, Keegan Holley <[email protected]> wrote: > I know the subject of JunOS versions has been beaten to death, but I've > never seen this specific question asked or answered. I'm trying to decide > between 10.0 or 10.4 for a network of MX, M (10i, 120 and 40e) and J series > routers. I'd like to choose a train with extended support. I'm trying to > decide between the risk of undiscovered bugs in 10.4 and having to upgrade > sooner when 10.0 goes EOS. We run L3VPN, with some L2VPN and a shrinking > VPLS footprint. Most of the M's and MX's have a full table with some acting > as regional route reflectors. Just wanted to get the general opinion of > those running similar applications. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
