> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:05:25 -0700 (PDT) > From: Derick Winkworth <[email protected]> > Sender: [email protected] > > Argh! Please tell me this is a joke! > > > > ________________________________ > From: David Ball <[email protected]> > To: Juniper-Nsp <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, April 12, 2011 9:46:45 AM > Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 - restricted bundles and disabled 10G ports. > > A question almost too obvious to ask, but can someone with one of > the restricted MX80 bundles (which disables 2 of the 10G ports) > confirm that ports 0/0/0 and 0/0/1 are the ones left enabled? I don't > have a restricted one yet, and am trying to finish a standards doc. > Thanks....just trying to avoid assumptions here. <g> > > David > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Oh, it most certainly is a joke! A bad one. But that does not make it less real. Reminds me of 20 or 25 years ago when Digital came out with a cheap micro-VAX system that was identical to a much more expensive system with the exception of the epoxy with which they filled the expansion slots. The cost of a replacement Q-Bus backplane was far below the difference between the two systems, so guess what everyone was doing! That joke turned out to be on DEC. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
