Daniel, I have nothing but good things to say about the MX80. It's based on the Trio chipset which means that the data plane is all ASIC based. I use it personally for creating complex logical topologies using the logical-systems feature. The MX80 is more than enough to meet your requirements below. The only downside I can think of is that it doesn't have dual routing engines. If that's a requirement you have to move up to the MX240 and above.
Thank you, .................................... Doug Hanks Systems Engineer JNCIP-M/T #1441 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Faubel Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 4:09 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 Opinions Hello all, Could I get some of your opinions about the MX80 platform? I'm looking for positive and negative opinions. Any gotchas I should know about? I've always used the Cisco type of CLI, so there will be a learning curve there. The traffic volume for this application will be 10-15g/sec of v4 and v6. Full BGP tables of each. And there will be some MPLS needed. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
