We're running R5.5 for a couple of our MX480s undergoing testing as BRAS. Ran the code to resolve an issue where PPPoE states are stucked at Terminating only to run to an issue where PPPoE state unable to move beyond Init in this release. Go figure.
Last we heard from our SEs, the 10.4 release may even go as far out as R8 so given our situation with MX PPPoE subscriber management, we're most likely going to play catchup. ihsan On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:05 AM, David Ball wrote: > I'm about to stand this up on some MX80s in the lab but wondered if > any bleeding-edgers out there have already ruled it out on the > platform, and if so, why. Certainly mileage will vary depending on > what you're doing with it, but I'm asking in general (we're > dual-stacked QoS-enabled MPLS with all services in BGP-signalled VPNs > with some policing, for example). > > I know it's unreasonable to have people continually posting to the > list asking about which code is best, but I know many were waiting for > a stable 10.4 revision (due in part to its' EEOL nature) but last I > heard, 10.4R2 (or was it R3) wasn't ready for primetime. Didn't find > much in the archives about 10.4R4. > > David > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
