The MX probably has the best support for QinQ I've seen. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew S. Crocker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 12:02 PM To: Doug Hanks Cc: Matthew S. Crocker; [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches
Can the MX80 handle QinQ? Can I run QinQ for this customer and MPLS in my 10GigE core? I don't think the EX 4200 can do that. If I wanted to stay MPLS would I need to configure each vlan on the customer interface and map it to a unqiue CCC to the other end (EX4200->MX80 & MX80->EX4200)? ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Doug Hanks" <[email protected]> > To: "Matthew S. Crocker" <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 2:42:17 PM > Subject: RE: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches > > It's probably easier to use QinQ. > > Doug > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew S. > Crocker > Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 7:08 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [j-nsp] dot1q CCC/MPLS on EX4200 series switches > > > Hello, > > I have a customer handing me a GigE with dot1q tags to my EX4200 > switch. I need to carry the GigE/dot1q over a couple other EX4200s > and terminate on a GigE port of my MX80. I've read through the > docs for building MPLS/ccc circuits between the two devices. It > isn't clear to me if I need to establish a ccc for each vlan (i.e. > I will need to know the VLANs the customer is sending me). Or, can > I create one CCC that will catch all tags and transport them across > my MPLS and dump them out the MX80. I would prefer not having to > know the VLANs my customer is sending me. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
