Thanks.. yeah the MTU statement is legacy and in place for some other Radius authentications....;)
I thought our entries had the Framed-IP-Netmask in them so will have to check again as you're right it's not there obviously... wouldn't think that would stop the IP from getting assigned but could be wrong... Take care, Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Adams Sent: August-11-11 2:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Radius - Static IP / ERX Once upon a time, Paul Stewart <[email protected]> said: > Getting ready to cut an ERX into production shortly and the only thing not > working is static IP assignments via Radius. According to the docs, you can > use "Framed-IP-Address" the same as we do in Cisco land today.. but it > doesn't' work. Your example entry doesn't have a Framed-IP-Netmask set, which may be required. Also, Framed-MTU is pretty much useless; since PPP is already negotiated before RADIUS authentication occurs, link MTU is already established before your Framed-MTU entry can have any affect (this has always been the case with PPP+RADIUS, but lots of examples show Framed-MTU anyway). -- Chris Adams <[email protected]> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
