*Is there interest in: - VPLS Multihoming scenarios? - Enabling Spanning Tree on the PE towards the CE per VPLS instance? - Enabling the use of P2MP LSPs for BUM traffic*
Definitely yes for all the 3 above, regarding the P2MP LSP for BUM traffic, I would ideally like to see some best practice/design for firewall filter on the PE's to limit/reduce the BUM traffic Also Design considerations about H-VPLS would be nice, so solutions with LDP mesh-groups , as well as on using Route Reflector in BGP based VPLS. Cheers On 21 September 2011 15:13, Stefan Fouant <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > I am in the process of writing some literature regarding VPLS and would > like to ask you, the Junos user community, to provide some insight into what > you would like to see in embodied in such a work. > > What are some of the areas with which you feel need more clarification, > either from a theoretical standpoint or in practical implementations, > additionally, what areas do you feel the VPLS documentation is lacking and > warrants better examples. > > Is there interest in: > > - VPLS Multihoming scenarios? > - Enabling Spanning Tree on the PE towards the CE per VPLS instance? > - Enabling the use of P2MP LSPs for BUM traffic? > > As many suggestions as you can provide folks, feel free to respond > privately if you so wish. > > Thanks in advance, > > -- > Stefan Fouant > JNCIE-ER, JNCIE-M, JNCIE-SEC, JNCI > Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks > > Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate > ______________________________**_________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp> > -- Humair _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
