On 28 September 2011 14:27, Peter K <[email protected]> wrote: > > Goal is to deploy label switch routers specifically functioning only as PE > (distribution) nodes with direct connectivity to the P\PE (core) nodes and > avoid the configuration required for a full mesh of LSP’s and l2vpn > signaling between the P\PE core nodes and the PE distribution nodes. Below > is an outline of requirements.
Safe to assume you're running LDP on your LERs as well ? > > I am noticing the pseudo-wire is attempting to establish a session across a > routed link (with RSVP and MPLS enabled) without a defined LSP path causing > any pseudo-wires using that path to go down. The pseudo-wire > re-establishes its connection when the IGP metric is modified and reroutes > traffic or when then named LSP is created between the two PE nodes. > Although this appears to be an issue regarding order of operations when > deploying a new node(d) in this configuration, is there a mechanism in place > to restrict pseudo-wires from trying to establish connections across a path > without an established LSP path across the connection? Not sure I follow here. All your L2vpns traversing a given link from your LER to the LSR drop when a new one is being signalled? When they drop, what is the output of a 'show l2vpn connections' for them ? David _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
