Thanks again to all of valued member for putting valued information.
________________________________ From: Doug Hanks <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Md. Jahangir Hossain <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:00 PM Subject: Re: [j-nsp] About Juniper MX10 router performance The MX5 scaling is identical to the MX80. The only difference is that the MX5 restricts the physical port usage to MIC0. 3,000,000 IPv4 prefixes in the RIB. 1,000,000 IPv4 unicast in the FIB. Thank you, -- Doug Hanks - JNCIE-ENT #213, JNCIE-SP #875 Sr. Systems Engineer Juniper Networks On 4/23/12 2:44 AM, "Saku Ytti" <[email protected]> wrote: >On (2012-04-22 23:52 -0700), Md. Jahangir Hossain wrote: > >> In some of forum i found 1.6million but in juniper site i can not found >>this information. > >This is certainly possible and will scale further, depending of course >what >other things are populated in RLDRAM. Giving exact answer might prove >difficult. >More than likely you'll find control-plane scaling to be insufficient >before you'll be bothered by RDLRAM being filled. > >-- > ++ytti >_______________________________________________ >juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
