I have observed this on both an srx240 and srx210h. Jtac advised turning
off utm and idp (on 210), yet those were enabled before with no issues. The
240 was fresh out of the box getting initial config (IP, Nat, zones,
policies, I.e. nothing amazing).

I'll be waiting to see the answers too!
On May 5, 2012 7:56 AM, "Maciej Jan Broniarz" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My SRX240 box started showing the following error in the logs:
>
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 00: sp = 0x49202a58, pc =
> 0x08020254
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 01: sp = 0x49202b00, pc =
> 0x0800c1fc
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 02: sp = 0x49202b70, pc =
> 0x0800d300
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 03: sp = 0x49202b90, pc =
> 0x082cb550
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 04: sp = 0x49202be8, pc =
> 0x080198c0
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 05: sp = 0x49202c10, pc =
> 0x080198c0
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 06: sp = 0x49202c38, pc =
> 0x080198c0
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 07: sp = 0x49202c60, pc =
> 0x08019a2c
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 08: sp = 0x49202c98, pc =
> 0x0801fc34
> May  5 00:36:08  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 09: sp = 0x49202cc0, pc =
> 0x09dc54c8
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab SCHED: Thread 14 (Forwarding
> Thread) ran for 1572 ms without yielding
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Scheduler Oinker
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 00: sp = 0x491b8c68, pc =
> 0x08020254
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 01: sp = 0x491b8d10, pc =
> 0x0800c1fc
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 02: sp = 0x491b8d80, pc =
> 0x088b3c8c
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 03: sp = 0x491b8dd0, pc =
> 0x088b76d0
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 04: sp = 0x491b8e50, pc =
> 0x0801fc34
> May  5 00:36:18  srx240-lab srx240-lab Frame 05: sp = 0x491b8e78, pc =
> 0x09dc54c8
>
> The box isn't heavy loaded - just about 1-2megs of trafiic per sec.
>
> What might be the problem here?
>
> All best,
> mjb
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to