I find quite the opposite with the M20 brother, the SSB-E and SSB-E-16 Although what is usually bad on them, if I get a bad one once in a while, is SRAM. It fails. Also, it takes some time in operation to detect bad ones. The DRAM can also fail and the rest of it is pretty much irreplacable unless you are going to solder.
It's possible that your vendor maybe put a stack of known bad crap in a box for you? Dave Temkin [d...@temk.in] wrote: > Anyone here running SCB-E's in a significant production deployment > and found that there's an extremely high hardware failure rate? > > I'm collecting examples to show that this is more than just > anecdotal. Either/or info welcome (ie - you're running dozens > without issue, or you've seen the same). > > Thanks, > -Dave > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -- Keep them laughing half the time, scared of you the other half. And always keep them guessing. -- Clair George _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
