A downgrade from 11.4R2.14 to 11.2R7.4 fixed the problem.
I now see a v6 default route in the vrf...
Grrrr... Thats a pretty big bug to be in the second code revision of
that train
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:33:26 -0600, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
Please provide the output of
show route table dmz.inet6.0 xxxx:a500:0:2::1
Thanks,
--Stacy
On Jun 12, 2012, at 11:48 PM, Gordon Smith wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody's come across this before - default IPv6
static not appearing in the routing instance inet6 table...
Instance is a VRF:
instance-type vrf;
interface ge-1/1/0.503;
interface ge-1/1/0.504;
route-distinguisher 56263:101;
vrf-import [ reject-all ];
vrf-export [ reject-all ];
vrf-table-label;
routing-options {
graceful-restart;
rib dmz.inet6.0 {
static {
route ::/0 next-hop xxxx:a500:0:2::1;
}
}
static {
route 0.0.0.0/0 {
next-hop xxx.x.216.54;
no-readvertise;
}
}
}
Looking at the dmz.inet6.0 table shows directly connected routes,
but not the default.
In contrast, dmz.inet.0 has a v4 default as expected.
I must be doing something wrong here....
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
