On (2012-07-23 13:55 +0200), Daniel Roesen wrote: > Actually, I see it came in 12.0(10)S, so it was there, but we were > running OSPF, not IS-IS, so no help.
Aye. Some dirt towards cisco too, it is ridiculous you don't have feature parity in ISIS and OSPF in things like these, these should use common codepath, single file in source code repo for any half decent design. While academically OSPF and ISIS are very much the same, in practice as they are developed in very insulated manner, it makes sense to run what everyone else is running, in hopes that the big dogs lab them and request for critical features. This is, in my opinion, the main reason for SP to run ISIS. Common wisdom is to run which ever your people are familiar with, but people change and learning basics of operating ISIS or OSPF is matter of hours anyhow. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
