I believe in one of my experiments I had simple config with be = 85% transmit, 
nc = 5% transmit and nothing more, total of 100% with gig if, still seeing over 
50 Mbit/s from test classes, but I'll be back Monday after more testing.

/Per

Sent from my iPad, please ignore stupid spelling corrections!

13 okt 2012 kl. 22:25 skrev Stefan Fouant <[email protected]>:

> On Oct 13, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Per Westerlund <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Note that the scheduler "tmp-be" is not used. My belief is that everything 
>> that is not explicitly mentioned in the scheduler-map is handled by the 
>> default configuration (in practice the rest of the flows hit the default 
>> best-effort forwarding-class).
> 
> This is not correct. When you explicitly define a scheduler-map and apply it 
> to an interface, there is no default configuration anymore applied to that 
> interface. What this means is there is no guarantee to Best Effort or Network 
> Control at all, and your experience may vary depending on network conditions. 
>  You are correct, however that the rest of the traffic will hit your BE 
> forwarding-class, but there are no guarantees to this class.
> 
> If you have BE traffic, or NC, and you want to accommodate it, then you need 
> to make sure you configure the appropriate schedulers and apply them to your 
> scheduler-map.
> 
> Can you do that and then when you have it configured properly see what your 
> results look like. We can take it from there if you are still experiencing 
> issues.
> 
> Stefan Fouant
> JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ENT, JNCI
> Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
> 
> Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to