Hi Tim indeed was Cisco directly telling me to use C3800X but I guess I know why....
I was thinking to EX4200 or EX4550... MPLS is not needed. Cisco 3400E has only 10/100 24 ports and 2 combo as far as I know... Ric Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 07:56:06 -0600 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco 3800X From: [email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Any of the EX3200/3300/4200 meet those requirements, but do not have the full MPLS suite that the 3800X will have, nor do they have the buffers that the 3800X does. If that's all you want from a switch, the 3800X is overkill, maybe look at ME3400E vs EX4200/3300.. --Tim On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Riccardo S <[email protected]> wrote: Which is, from your point of view, the equivalent model of Cisco 3800X metro ethernet ? I’m focusing on the following feature needed: - At least 24 gigaethernet ports - Full BGP support - Full multicast support - Ethernet-aggregation (LAG) - Full layer2 capabilities For the decision takes sense also a cost analysis, as far as I can understand Cisco 3800X is more than 20k $ price list… Tks _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
