Thanks RAS.. that's interesting as we've never actually tried that... Have you tried this in a production environment or would you? Do we have any idea on whether or not JTAC would support this configuration officially?
I realize these are loaded questions - just really curious on this topic as it opens up some "new possibilities" for us in some deployments... Our SE basically told us to "run" from this idea previously... Cheers ;) Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard A Steenbergen Sent: January-09-13 2:56 PM To: Jose Sanchez Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Question about Routing Engine Redundancy on MX On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:39:05PM -0600, Jose Sanchez wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody know if the RE Redundancy in Juniper MX Routers requires > that both RE are the same hardware or it is enough that the REs has > the same JUNOS Version? As long as they're reasonably similar it should work fine. For MX that pretty much means RE-2000 and RE-1300, you have no hope in hell of mismatching the new ones (RE-1800x2/4, which require 64-bit JUNOS) with the old ones. For some definition of work of course (for all of the active redundancy), where in my experience the answer is "it doesn't". :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
