what device(s)? reth interfaces on SRX's or AE interfaces on EX's sounds like what you are looking for.
virtual chassis between a couple EX switches, and LACP on the ae interface which has its physical interfaces across 2 physically separated switches connected to a server that is using LACP as well should work. I know people have done it, i just cant personally speak from experience On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Morgan McLean <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Mark is referring to bonding under linux...right? Typically bonding > has an active / passive pair, and it can also round robin sending the > packets out individual interfaces. Obviously all returning traffic will be > destined to one mac, which is the active slave at the time. > > Bonding also supports LACP though. > > Morgan > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Dale Shaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Mark Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is it possible to have the same ip accessible via two interfaces the > same > > > way you would on a server. This is on an mx series router. > > > > What do you mean when you say "..the same way you would on a server" ? > > > > Assigning the same IP address to separate interfaces (logical or > > physical) is usually "wrong", unless each interface is in a separate > > routing instance/VRF. > > > > Can you describe your scenario? > > > > Cheers, > > Dale > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Morgan > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
