> Any features specifically that you're curios about? Has anyone done/used the VC feature? How stable is it? Does it function in a similar manner to that of the EX4200's? How do they handle the loss of a member?
These will be closet stacks, so little need for any L3 functionality. However, in the event I bring L3 down to the access layer, is the OSPF implementation usable? (my experience has been on 3200/4200's primarily). I believe I read something about limitations. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Paulhamus, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > We have well approximately 75 of the 2200's and closer to 250 of the > 4200's / 4500's either standalone or in VC. A few bugs along the way > with earlier code - but now we've stuck with 11.4R5.7 code and all is well. > I've mixed the 2200's with mostly Cisco, and 3com / HP and have had no > issues with compatibility other than a few gotchas with VLAN pruning on the > Cisco's that we easily accounted for. For what it's worth, we also use > SRX's combined with Cisco routers and firewalls for VPN's as well without > any issues. > > Any features specifically that you're curios about? > > > > > From: Doug McIntyre [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 6:47 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX2200 Series > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 03:09:16PM -0700, Bill Blackford wrote: > > I am interested in hearing any feedback about the EX2200. In particular, > > anyone who has done a recent enterprise deployment in a converged and in > > particular, a mixed vendor environment. > > I've used the EX2200's, and aside from the "limited" features compared > to the rest of the EX line, they operate exactly the same, just missing > a couple things that are mentioned in the datasheets. Although they > recently (12.x) brought Virtual Chassis to it, I haven't done that yet. > > As to mixed vendor, you'd have to state what protocols you are > expecting in a mixed vendor? They do STP and RSTP just fine. They > won't do cisco proprietary protocols, such as CDP or VDP. They have > standards based proprotocols that are equivilent. I've done OSPF and > BGP (still accounting for all switches have limited BGP route space) > with no issues. > > Overall, I've had much less problems with the Juniper switches (aside > from some bad releases, especially on the EX4550 line) than my cisco > switches all around. I have had some wonkiness getting especially old > cisco software talking, but the problem has always been on the cisco side. > Usually upgrading the cisco to newer code solved their bugs (ie. LACP). > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Bill Blackford Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges..... _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
