Hi

you search for persistent nat:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos-security/junos-security96/junos-security-swconfig-security/understand-persistent-nat-section.html


But configuring splitted src-NAT isn't
such a burden. Just go to your src-nat rulset
and insert a second rule, that covers 
the one half of your internal network via
the match statement. It's quite simple. 


If you need explicit help, post your config. 


Klaus
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:08 AM, William McLendon <[email protected]>
wrote:

> hi all,
> We have an issue where we have enough internal users and sessions using the 
> general outbound NAT that we are hitting the session limit for the single 
> public IP due to running out of ports. (really its due to how Source NAT is 
> carved up on an HA pair…see http://kb.juniper.net/KB14958 )
> However I think if just add additional IPs to NAT the users to, it may end up 
> breaking some applications as they establish a new outbound session from 
> clicking a URL or something, but that session gets NAT'd to the other IP that 
> the far side is not expecting to see it from.
> I think ScreenOS had something called Sticky DIP that could help mitigate 
> this where for some NAT Timer, any session initiated by an IP address would 
> always be NAT'd to the same public IP -- does SRX have a similar feature?  If 
> not, I think my only other option then would be to carve up the internal 
> networks, ie 10.10.10/24 NATs to public IP A, and 11.11.11.0/24 NATs to 
> public IP B, etc. which is probably ok, but can get a little cumbersome.
> Or if anyone knows another way please share :)
> Thanks,
> Will
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to