This is definitely concerning as we have quite a number of SRX100/110 deployed (we use them for managed SOHO services). I haven't seen any discontinuation notice - anyone else? I agree though that it's just a matter of time thoughÂ..
Paul On 2013-07-21 1:42 AM, "Skeeve Stevens" <[email protected]> wrote: >Yes, > >Looks like the SX100B and SRX100H have been discontinued and replaced with >the SRX100H2. > >Also SRX110H-V{A,B} replaced with SRX110H2-V{A,B} models. > >I think the requirements for UTM and AppSecure needs more RAM. > > > > >...Skeeve > >*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd >[email protected] ; www.eintellegonetworks.com > >Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > >facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> >linkedin.com/in/skeeve > >twitter.com/networkceoau ; blog: www.network-ceo.net > > >The Experts Who The Experts Call >Juniper - Cisco - Cloud > > >On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Michael Dale <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Just wondering if anyone has noticed that it looks like the entire SRX >> branch range has been upgraded to 2GB ram: >> http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000281-en.pdf >> >> These models need at least JunOS 12.1X44-D15 >> >> I just took delivery of a bunch of SRX110s and I suspect these are now >>the >> old models. Bit of a pain! >> >> Thanks, >> Michael. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> >_______________________________________________ >juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
