It looks like there is a limitation as to the number of times you can inherit settings from a particular vrrp-group on a single interface, but is this correct?

Assume you have a single vlan with multiple IP subnets configured. However, all you need is to have a single vrrp-group where all of the other IP subnets can inherit vrrp config information from, let's say, the vrrp group with the preferred address. For example:

[edit interfaces irb unit 100]
MX# show
family inet {
    address 192.168.37.3/25 {
        preferred;
        vrrp-group 100 {
            priority 125;
            accept-data;
            virtual-address 192.168.37.1;
        }
    }
    address 192.168.38.3/25 {
        vrrp-group 101 {
            virtual-address 192.168.38.1;
            vrrp-inherit-from {
                active-interface irb.100;
                active-group 100;
            }
        }
    }
    address 192.168.39.3/25 {
        vrrp-group 102 {
            virtual-address 192.168.39.1;
            vrrp-inherit-from {
                active-interface irb.100;
                active-group 100;
            }
        }
    }
}


For each IP address configured on the IRB interface (associated with one particular vlan), you must have a DIFFERENT vrrp-group configured, even though the "inheriting" addresses are only effectively using the vrrp-group number as unique identifiers and place holders.

If you try to use the SAME vrrp-group number for each address; e.g. "100", you get a configuration error upon commit:

"Duplicate interface: irb unit: 100 vrrp-group: 100 for address:....."

Vrrp has a limitation as to the nunmber of groups available per vlan, 255. Granted, having more than 255 addresses per interface is a lot, but it seems arbitrary that the MX limits you to only having 255 IP subnets per vlan that can use VRRP.

Having a maximum of 255 VRRP active groups per vlan makes sense, as this is what the VRRP standard specifies, but when you have a bunch of basically "inactive" groups that inherit from one active group, it seems bizarre that Junos says, "NOPE, you can only have a maximum of 254 placeholders for inactive vrrp groups per interface."

Am I misunderstanding something here?

Clarke Morledge
College of William and Mary
Information Technology - Network Engineering
Jones Hall (Room 18)
Williamsburg VA 23187
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to