The new MS-MIC is coming too... http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/concept/ms-mic-and-mpc-overview.html
So, it fits in MPC1/MPC2, if you have a free MIC slot. It costs a lot less than the MS-DPC, although it has about the same capacity. Fits in the back of MX80 too... -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tomasz Mikolajek Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 9:13 PM To: rkramer Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] NAT on MX platforms? Hi. Now we are testing Juniper device do CGNAT. MX240 with MS-DPC card. Everything work fine. I heard that in new year will be shipped new service card. Can any one say more about "new" MS-DPC? 2013/9/18 rkramer <[email protected]> > I currently use MX240's throughout my routing environment today, and > I'm looking to upgrade my existing NAT boxes, which are Cisco ASR's. > They are running out of horsepower, and from what I'm seeing, MS-DPC's > on MX's provide more than enough capacity... I'm not planning to do > any firewalling at the NAT locations, just nat pools and 1:1 nat > translations, with some 6to4 thrown in for good measure. > > > Anyway, I'm assuming someone on the list has to be running MX's doing NAT? > How is it working out for you? Any pitfalls? > > > Ryan Kramer > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
