I thought about and ACL but it's a very last escape... I'd prefer TCP storage session is not attracted at all...
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Junos ospf question > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:18:49 +0000 > > I'm thinking the answer is not ospf magic, but rather some form of QoS policy > on the 1Gig link, or even an ACL to selectively slow/block your specific high > throughput networks. > > Brad > > > On 25/09/2013, at 18:09, "R S" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > basically I've a triangulation A - B - C - A > > > > single area 0 > > > > A-B link is 10Gbs > > A-C and B-C is 1 Gbs > > > > since in A-B run a very high volume of traffic (storage), I do not want if > > A-B fails this traffic goes through C > > > > C redistribute as well statics into OSPF > > > > Hope it clear now > > > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Junos ospf question > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:23:39 +0200 > > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > > Can you give some more details? I'm not sure I understand all of your > > requirements. > > Are you trying to influence something native to OSPF, or are you talking > > about setting metrics for routes redistributed (Cisco-speak) from another > > protocol? > > /Per > > 25 sep 2013 kl. 10:09 skrev R S <[email protected]>:I understood the same > > and I need to be able to drop network announcement in a very granular way... > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
