Thanks very much Nikita! I think I can make this work for our situation now 
that you’ve done all the work! :D


On Oct 31, 2013, at 12:00 AM, Nikita Shirokov <[email protected]> wrote:

> The closest thing which could do what you want is commit script + apply 
> macro. Something like this:
> https://github.com/tehnerd/juniper_scripts/blob/master/commit/com_test.slax
> —
> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:57 AM, Brad Fleming <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone know any tricks for creating a grouping of interfaces based on 
> the description attached? 
> For example: Any logical interface with the label “BACKBONE to far-node” goes 
> into a group that could then be referenced in OSPF, LDP, RSVP, etc. 
> 
> An interface-range is close but doesn’t allow you to reference a tagged link; 
> it expands it’s members only to ge-0/0/0.0 even if other units are configured 
> within the range. Interface-sets are not allowed to be referenced in protocol 
> configuration as near as I can tell. 
> 
> I’d really love a way to provision an interface, label it with “BACKBONE” or 
> “CPE”, and have that label automatically configure the interface for the 
> proper protocols. It’d really eliminate mistakes when turning up new tail 
> circuit locations. Any suggestions or pointers would be greatly appreciated! 
> _______________________________________________ 
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to