On 2/18/14, 4:43 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Darius Jahandarie > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It is worth pointing out that no transit providers actually accept >> flowspec. > > Some transit providers do in fact utilize flowspec, keeping in mind > various implementation and performance issues. I don't know of any > who accept it from downstream customers, but that doesn't mean there > aren't any, of course.
some experience with labbing it says you don't know which or when flowsec route insertion is going to cause aberrant performance. In the optimistic case that means at a minimum you want the operation of the router and the flowspec to be coordinated because remediation may be required. > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> > > Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. > > -- John Milton > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing > list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
