instability while in vc and/or update beyond 30 days kinda sound like
table-stake issues to me.


On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Aaron Dewell <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> I don't know if I'd call them issues.  Just ELS introduces different
> configuration hierarchies that is the way things will be in the future.
>  The functionality is still there even if the config bits change some.
>
> The main advantage of the 4300 vs. 4200 is 4x10G uplinks instead of 2, and
> 40G QSFP+ ports which can be either VC or routed.  It's a lot more flexible
> platform and much more compatible with others (read: QFX5100) than the
> EX4200 will ever be.
>
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 2:36 PM, ryanL wrote:
> > welp, i was about to pull the trigger and order the ex4300's for a new
> > rack, but i think i'll stick to the ex4200 for now.
> >
> > appreciative of people pointing out current issues (even tho i'm not the
> > original poster).
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to