Hi Christ, This from Juniper about exporting into ospf and metrics:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.1/topics/concept/ospf-routing-external-metrics-overview.html So if you exported your static routes into OSPF they will be a Type 2 external metric (you can check with "show ospf database external detail"), use only external cost and not take into account the link-state metric in your diagram. * You might have to write an export policy: from protocol static + any route-filter that you need, then accept and also add metric xx Thanks, Eduardo Eduardo Barrios, EIT, JNCIP-SP Telecommunications Specialist Lower Colorado River Authority | 3505 Montopolis Dr. | Austin, TX 78744 512.730.6332 ph -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Crist Clark Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 5:12 PM To: <[email protected]> Puck Subject: [External] [j-nsp] OSPF Confusion . The problem is that R3 sees R2 as the best next hop for all of the statics on R2. I don't understand why. The cost of the path from R3 to R2 is lowest via R1, 11 vs. 20, right? . _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
