Hi Chris, As I understand from your comment , if I send traffic to a tagged unit , all monitored traffic will be tagged with that unit tag ? how can I do to preserve the initials .1q header ? in my config , MX is strippingtags before sending the traffic out .
Br. BEN HAMMADI Kayssar NOKIA SOLUTION NETWORKS Lead Engineer -BroadBand Connectivity JNCIE-M (#471), JNCIE-SP (#1147), CCIP Mobile : +216 29 349 952 / +216 98 349 952 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ext Chris Wopat Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 1:33 PM To: Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Port mirring on MX80 to tagged interface On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Ben Hammadi, Kayssar (NSN - TN/Tunis) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I have the below config running on MX80 without issues ( 4 inline instances > ) , is there any particular reason to send traffic to a tagged unit instead > of physical interface ? Convenience - I don't currently have a server that is physically near this router/cage/floor of this particular data center. I don't yet have evidence to conclude that the issue is because of this, especially since it's working just fine in a different datacenter. Thanks for the example of your config, I may further adjust a few settings such as sample rate to see if it's related to that somehow. ..or just bug JTAC. --Chris _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
