On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 08:50:09 AM Krasimir Avramski wrote: > I didn't mention you are interested in RPT-SPT mode - I > just thought you have local PE receivers issue that was > typical in early days of mvpn and of course we used > SPT-only with SSM mode.There were inherent pfe > infrastructure problems with composite nh needed to > dealt with direct ifls and p2mp (especially on source > PE).
Yep, I remember that bug. It was a real PITA. Having Sender PE routers also act as a Receiver PE router with DPC's, or with unpatched versions of Junos 10 on MPC's was a disaster. We had to switch back to M320's/T320's in order to have a Sender PE router being a Receiver PE router also. To be fair, I haven't yet tested whether this is now fixed in current code. Junos 10 was a looooong time ago :-). Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
