You can use the Junos annotate feature if the description nob is unavailable.
--tc On Nov 5, 2014 7:50 AM, "Harri Makela via juniper-nsp" < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi There > > > > > is there anyway that we can add description of firewall policies. Firewall > policy name is restricted to 63 chracters on Junos which is not sufficient > to review the firewall policies on periodic basis. I can only add flows > related information with policy name and description is required to add > further details like who requested it, when it was added, quarterly review > if this flow is required not etc. to comply with AUDIT requirements > > > > > > Thnaks > > On Wednesday, 29 October 2014, 16:05, " > [email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: CoS on iSCSI ports (Eugeniu Patrascu) > 2. EX4600 third party optic (Johan Borch) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 01:09:49 +0200 > From: Eugeniu Patrascu <[email protected]> > To: Mike Gonnason <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] CoS on iSCSI ports > Message-ID: > <CALgc3C64g8g5JrnN+uzkLUu-=umsdyqn_kz2wqt7e+br1_k...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > If memory serves me right, the 5% bandwidth is actually prioritized when > you do something on the switch via SSH/Telnet/J-Web so that in case your > switch is running line-rate, you can actually log into it. > > Also, disable flow-control, it's not helping. > > Regards, > Eugeniu > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Mike Gonnason <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For my iSCSI stuff, I have been disabling pause frames as they are not > > really beneficial for my situation. I had a NetApp (forget what model) > that > > would saturate a 10Gb link and the Juniper would send a pause frame with > > the result of dropping all connections across that trunk. Not very > helpful. > > > > You can try modifying the NC class and alter how the scheduling is > > performed. in section 21 you can see 5% is specified for the NC > scheduler. > > > > > > > http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.2/topics/example/cos-ex-series-configuring.html > > > > > > -Mike Gonnason > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Josh Farrelly <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > We have 2x EX4550's in VC that provide switching for an iSCSI network. > > > There are 3 Dell SANs and 4 Dell R820 ESXi hosts connected via twinax @ > > > 10Gbps. Jumbo frames and flow control is enabled. > > > > > > My knowledge around Juniper tech is a little vague, but what's with the > > > default CoS settings on the switch? It seems they will automatically > > > reserve 5% for network control traffic. Is there anyway to disable CoS > > > entirely? AFAIK Brocade & Cisco don't have this type of default, and 5% > > of > > > a 10Gbps is actually a rather significant chunk of bandwidth. > > > > > > The reason I'm asking is that we've seen some performance issues > lately. > > > We have a hybrid-SSD tray of storage that can saturate a link, so we're > > > seeing MAC pause frames being received by the switch as well as > discards > > on > > > some of the queues. > > > > > > Thanks for any pointers. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Josh. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:51:15 +0100 > From: Johan Borch <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: [j-nsp] EX4600 third party optic > Message-ID: > <CAB_jNCR9BeSeNO2ER_+5LrO2WTT=vg5gbyjpvvhuxkfjss7...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hi! > > Do anyone have experience with third party optics (SFP/SFP+) in EX4600? > > Johan > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > ------------------------------ > > End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 143, Issue 27 > ******************************************** > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
