> the lack of LSR functionality in the EX won't work for us. I'm curious to know what MPLS features or functionalities are lacking on the EX4550 in comparison to MX series.
Thanks, Phil ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 11:10:51 AM Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 144, Issue 16 Message: 2 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 06:34:43 -0500 From: Austin Brower <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [j-nsp] ACX is just not there (was Re: EX4550 L2Circuit/VPN to MX80/lt Interface) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Eric Van Tol <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Juniper have continued to come short in this area. And no, >> the ACX doesn't cut it. > > Agreed. ACX is just not there. It baffles me why Juniper has left > this market untapped. The mid-range MX is just too expensive and too > big for our deployments and the lack of LSR functionality in the EX > won't work for us. So far, Eric, Mark, and Phil have all stated that the ACX is not the right platform for their purposes. Could you elaborate on why? I've been looking at the ACX with some curiosity as a migration tool for some of my fiber constrained sites where I have low capacity SONET systems (which are very slow to leave the network) and 1Gbps Ethernet switching (utilizing finicky ERPS). Thanks, Austin _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
