Hi Gert, I knew someone will dig into private addresses and topology hiding :). Come one, customers get network blueprints all the time, its BAU. And they get angry over broken/poor network performance not because they can't see P-core boxes in the traceroute.
adam > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Gert Doering > Sent: 20 February 2015 18:40 > To: Adam Vitkovsky > Cc: Juniper-Nsp; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] [j-nsp] draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 > > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:33:19PM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > And most importantly it's not actually needed it's just a whim of network > operators. > > You might have enough IPv4 addresses to use for your infrastructure - > many others haven't. > > (And no, RFC1918 addresses and MPLS topology hiding is what leads to > disgruntled customers going elsewhere) > > gert > > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > //www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
