Hi Olivier, My bad that I didn't specify this in original mail... Caveat here is that, next term shall be avoided as per requirement. -Thanks, Vijesh
________________________________________ From: juniper-nsp <[email protected]> on behalf of Olivier Benghozi <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] solution to a firewall question Replace accept with next term in f1 ? next term works across filter list from what I see and according to the documentation ( http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/firewall-filter-option-multiple-listed-overview.html <http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/concept/firewall-filter-option-multiple-listed-overview.html> ). Olivier > Le 23 avr. 2015 à 17:18, Vijesh Chandran <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi all, > I am wondering if we have a solution to this issue. > I need two firewall attached to an interface as input-list. e.g.: f1 and f2. > Input-list [f1 f2] > f1 to match a condition (all tcp port 80) and accept and count that packet. > f2 to classify those packets based on code points and push to a forwarding > class. Is this possible? _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
