> From: Mark Tinka [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 18 May 2015 13:23 > > On 18/May/15 14:11, Scott Granados wrote: > > I'm not sure exactly what you're looking for but the peer group system > under JunOS is fairly efficient. If you set your export and import policies > per > group the bgp process will place these in a peer group and dynamically break > off slow members in to their own groups so that one slower peer won't > cause the other members in the same peer group to synchronize as slowly. > Cisco does not or at least did not do this as I understand things. In the > cisco > case if a peer group member lags it causes the other members of the same > peer group to lag and doesn't allow updates until the slowest member > catches up. Since BGP under Junos breaks this slow guy off on it's own you > don't have the same limitation. This all happens dynamically. > > If memory serves, Cisco recently developed some kind of feature to deal > with slow peers to fix this very issue: > > http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/ios_xe/iproute_bgp/configurati > on/guide/2_xe/irg_xe_book/irg_slow_peer_xe.html > > Okay, so maybe not recently... > > Mark. Hi Mark,
Haaha yeah that one has been around for some time already :) adam --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
