I have set up the 104 in over seas pops and taken several views with out issue. At a minimum 2 full table feeds + some peering. SHouldn’t be a problem.
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 10:44 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >>> But MX104 can't hold the full internet routing table in forwarding-table so >>> it's good only for peering or can it indeed? >> >> Can't it? I've assumed it can. Haven't actually deployed one yet. > > It sure can. Last info I got from Juniper: 1.8M IPv4 or IPv6 prefixes > (or a combination of the two). > > We have quite a few MX104s in production with a full table, plus > assorted L3VPNs. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
