On 22/Jul/15 02:59, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
> I know that a ton of fixes on BGP convergence time son MX80 is definitely a 
> reason to be 'moving up'... however as you're on RE-2000s on MX480 may not be 
> applicable.
>
> I see you're running DPC cards, have you considered shifting those links onto 
> an MPC/Trio Card? (newer chip, more RAM, more horsepower, yadda yadda yadda 
> =)..) DPC was EOL a while ago, and everything has been Trio (and now Trio-NG 
> on the new -NG cards coming out now). As the FIB is pushed to hardware, it 
> may be some silly DPC thing you're running into.
>
> For things like Fusion or BNG or any other 
> new/advanced/this-is-what-PLM-is-thinking functions, we're already putting in 
> 14.2 on any new device we turn up, and have already started testing 15.1 for 
> the new NG cards we will likely be buying. Rest of our network is now on 
> 12.3R8 or 13.3 in many cases. (lots of BFD bugs have been squashed, some HQoS 
> issues fixed, host-outbound-traffic for BFD keepalives now honour the c-o-s 
> knobs, and are finally out of Queue 3 and into the Queue we want (7), etc... 
> preventing starvation if you happen to have re-used Queue 3 as "not-so-high" 
> priority, etc)... the list goes on.
>
> It's not a case of "if it aint broke, don't fix it" once you get 4-5 years 
> behind. You'll benefit from the years of "Oh, we finally fixed LLDP ascii 
> decoding" stuff that ends up getting traction; plus JTAC would really really 
> like it if you weren't on 11.4 =)

We've been on 14.2 for a while now, and settling into 14.2R3.8.

Happy, to be honest. Only real problem is policing on LAG's, but it's
manageable.

Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to