You didn't specify which REs you'd get with it. Make sure you are getting a pair. (Even though the 960 uses three SCBs, you can only use two REs in that chassis as well.) The R blades are pretty solid, but you didn't specify any sort of config requirements. What will you be using the MSDPC for? (Last I checked redundancy config for those was disappointing, but I haven't used one in about a year and a half now. In the past, mixed mode wasn't recommended, but it doesn't seem to be a big deal now. (If you are considering buying MPCs at some point to use with the R blades.)
Will On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote: > > > > > > > > Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or > > consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 > is > > too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960. > > You take a bigger hit on the MX960 with a fabric failure if all slots > are full. > > Because the MX240 and MX480 have fewer slots, your exposure is more > limited in this regard. > > But I think with the new SCB-E's, this may no longer be an issue for the > MX960. Been a while since I checked as we are exclusively MX480 for the > time being. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > . > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
