I'm referencing my experience from a few years back. Thank you for the clarification.
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 22, 2015, at 07:51, Damien DeVille <[email protected]> wrote: > > You absolutely can mix MPCs and DPCs in the same chassis. When the MPCs > first came out there were compatibility issues, but with modern Junos > versions (11.4 and on) those are history. > > > - Damien > >> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Bill Blackford <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I agree that this is a good build for what you've stated. I would definitely >> recommend an MS-DPC for off-loading any sampling or crypto. >> >> You mention higher density with the use of MICs in the future. This would >> require taking the plunge to MPC and a replacement of your DPCs (you cannot >> mix DPC and MPC on the same chassis) and depending on the MPC choices, >> possibly the fans, SBCs and REs as well. Just something to keep in mind. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Jul 22, 2015, at 06:24, Colton Conor <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following: >> > >> > >> > >> > 1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC >> > power >> > >> > >> > 2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhanced DPC for MX, requires optics sold >> > separately >> > >> > >> > >> > 1 x Juniper MS-DPC - IP services line card for MX Series Requires Junos OS >> > Release 9.3 and later >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Assuming we have the latest software version from Juniper to install on >> > this used box, is there anything we should know about this potential setup? >> > I believe this DPC cards are EOL, but I think many people are still using >> > them. I know there are more dense MIC cards out there, but that is not >> > needed at this time. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think everything about this system is redundant besides the MS-DPC, but I >> > could get another one of those too. >> > >> > >> > >> > Are there any licensing restrictions or upgrade restrictions I should be >> > aware of? Does Juniper have any locks or software limitations on these >> > larger routers like they do on the MX-5 through MX-80 and MX 104? >> > >> > >> > >> > Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or >> > consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is >> > too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960. >> > >> > >> > I would be upgrading from a MX80, so this is quite a jump. >> > _______________________________________________ >> > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
