Alternatively drop the iBGP session between the two MX80s. Depending on the topology, it may not be needed.
Regards, Dave On 13 October 2015 at 14:38, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 13/Oct/15 15:18, Dave Bell wrote: > >> >> Packet is sent to the EX. It does a route lookup, and has its default >> route set at MX80 A. Packet is forwarded to MX80 A. >> Packet is received by MX80 A. It does a route lookup, and the best >> route is via MX80 B. Packet is forwarded to EX. >> EX receives packet. It does a route lookup. Default route is via... > > This is exactly what I am thinking the issue is. > > No way the EX4550 can handle a full table (two, moreover) coming from > the MX80's. > > I'd say dump the EX4500 into Layer 2-only mode, run VRRP between the > MX80's, and Bob's the other thing... > > Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
