Anecdotally, we have an MX480 with RE-2000 in a very similar space as you're describing: taking in 4x full v4 tables, 3x full v6 tables, and a chunk of v4 and v6 peering routes at a couple of exchanges. No issues.

--
Hugo

[email protected]: email, xmpp/jabber
PGP fingerprint (B178313E):
CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E

(also on textsecure & redphone)

On Tue 2015-Oct-20 13:44:54 +0800, Chen Jiang <[email protected]> wrote:

RE-2000 could support about 10M route in RIB.

RE-2000 is X86 based RE and MX80/MX104 is PPC based RE.

From raw evaluation, in JUNOS PPC RE is about 1/3 performance vs. X86 RE
for same frequency,

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Colton Conor <[email protected]>
wrote:

How many full routes can two RE-S-2000-4096 in a MX480 support? How limited
is this older card? How does it compare to the RE found in the MX104 or
built into the MX80?

On the MX480, when do most make the decision to upgrade from the
RE-S-2000-4096
to a RE-S-1800X4-16G? What does the extra processing and ram enabled on
this newer card?

Application would be peering on an internet exchange with content
providers, and 4 connections to Tier one networks.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




--
BR!



          James Chen
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to