On 29 October 2015 at 14:22, Cydon Satyr <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any real drawbacks to running something like 32x10Gbps LAG link in core > instead of higher bandwidth physical links? Just seems so unreal. I imagine you have 70% utilisation, so you have 96Gbps of free capacity, but any single stream can only get 3Gbps, which may no be acceptable to all customers. So you may need to upgrade capacity earlier than you'd want to. Another difference is that you may lose capacity fractionally, so you may need to think bit about what is sensible 'min-links' setting. JunOS does have these days adaptive balancing, which essentially monitors if one link has higher utilisation than others, then proceeds to give smaller share of hash results to that interface. I don't know how well it works in practice. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
