On 30/Nov/15 22:56, Amos Rosenboim wrote:
> I don't think ASR1K is comparable to MX. I think the ASR1000 is comparable to the MX104 specifically. Both are platforms that are suited to a mix of Ethernet and non-Ethernet ports in a cost-effective manner. Where the ASR1000 edges our the MX104 is that there are various variants of the chassis, supporting low-, mid- and high-end forwarding capacities, native additional services such as IPSec, NAT, e.t.c. > The Juniper platform we position against ASR1K is the Juniper SRX. That is not really the ideal comparison, if you ask me. If you want to pit something against the SRX, for better or worse, I'd do the ASA. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
