There isn't a performance optimized version of XRv, it's really only useful for low speed applications like the vRR bersion of Junos. I do use them extensively for control plane testing and they work as vRRs.
Now 6.0 is starting to get there since it is Linux based instead of QNX, has CPU core affinities, etc. Afaik still no support for Intel DPDK like vMX and the vSR from ALU. Phil From: Adam Vitkovsky Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 7:52 AM To: Robert Hass; Mark Tinka Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vMX for ESXi Hi, > Robert Hass > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 12:03 PM > > But returning to vMX - we have a lot of use-cases for vMX, so Cisco products > are not cure for us :) Still waiting for *WORKING* vMX do VMware. > Got me wondering in what use cases vMX is better than XRv please? adam Adam Vitkovsky IP Engineer T: 0333 006 5936 E: [email protected] W: www.gamma.co.uk This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email [email protected] Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
