On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > On 1 June 2016 at 20:32, Phil Rosenthal <p...@isprime.com> wrote: > > I suspect that there is not that high of a risk of bugs due to this > change, in all likelihood, the only changes required for this was a > different compiler and perhaps the use of a few 64 bit instead of 32 bit > variables — but even with a low risk of bugs, if there is no benefit, I’m > not sure what the point of adding even a low risk of bugs. > > This is also not super new feature, it's been in shipping software for > over two years.
So this means we're half way towards it being stable right.... _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
