I mean operationally difference from JunOS to IOS/IOS-XR. In each case, policy must exist in config, but must not be applied to customer to achieve what you want.
So I do not understand your need for Cisco to implement 'test', I do not understand what is missing, operationally. On 22 March 2017 at 15:38, Brijesh Patel <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe so many diffrence between IOS and IOS-Xr. I am not 100% sure what > ares. Sorry > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 22 March 2017 at 14:58, Tomasz MikoĊajek <[email protected]> wrote: >> > You can use test policy when policy statment is commiteted. Is in active >> > configuration. If is not commited You get error: Policy referencje but >> > not >> > defined. >> >> Quite. Which is why I'm struggling to understand what is the >> difference to IOS/IOS-XR? >> >> -- >> ++ytti > > -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
