On 1 August 2017 at 14:48, Pavel Lunin <plu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some strange thing here is PFE_ID 128. This should be a kind of dummy ID > (MX960 max PFE_ID is 47), I don't know what it means. Maybe some I-CHIP > specificity, e. g., as I remember, they looped packets, switched between > two interfaces on the same PFE, through the fabric as well. Might be > related to something like this or a cosmetic bug in the log.
I raised the same point to Joerg in another forum and suggested JTAC, if I had to venture a guess, perhaps PFE_ID 128 is actually RE injected packet? -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
