Hello Aaron, If I may, I would advice you to drop LSYS for two reasons :
1/ on a practical level, it's more constraints and limitations than it sounds on the paper. After 5 years of running it into production, we have phased it out two weeks ago. 2/ it is dying and replacement feature (logical DOM) is planned for 2018 according to my SE. So, no more developments planned. My 2 cents. > Le 10 oct. 2017 à 02:45, Aaron Gould <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Ah, I see what you are asking. I don't know, perhaps someone on list knows > the particulars. > > About the multiple active fwd'ing paths for mhome'd pe-ce... I think someone > told me that is a benefit that evpn brings to the table... but I heard it > has something to do with per-vlan load sharing across those active/active > mhomed sites. > > Don't know yet, since I'm just diving into evpn, and am already discouraged > that I read that evpn isn't supported in lsys, ... lsys is the basis for all > my lab testing. Oh well, perhaps I'll pull a another acx5048 from the > warehouse and give it a whirl > > -Aaron > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
