Hi all,

I would like to discuss, how do you handle ddos attack pointing to IP address 
of any router core interface, if your UPLINK/ISP support RTBH and you would 
like to drop traffic at ISP level because of congested links.

I have tried to implement "classic" BGP signalized RTBH, via changing next-hop 
to discard route. It works good for customers IPs, but applied to 
core-interface IP address, it drops routing protocol running on this interfaces 
between routers (because /32 discard route is more specific than, at least, /31 
p2p). I tried to implement export filter between RIB and FIB (routing-options 
forwarding-table export) to not to install this routes to FIB. It looks better, 
it doesn't drop BGP/BFD/... anymore, but it works just by half. Try to explain:

I have two routers, both have transit operator (UPLINK-A, UPLINK-B) and they 
are connected to each other. Routers interconnect is let's say 
192.168.72.248/31 (248 router-A, 249 router-B). I will start to propagate via 
iBGP discard route 192.168.72.248/32 from ddos detection appliance to both 
routers. Router-B get RTBH route as the best, skip install to FIB because of 
export filter between RIB and FIB and will start to propagate appropriate route 
with blackhole community to UPLINK-B. UPLINK-B drops dst at their edge. Good.

But, router A get the same blackhole route, but not as the best, because it has 
the same route (/32) as a local route with lower route preference:

192.168.72.248/32  *[Local/0] 34w1d 07:59:10
                      Local via ae2.3900
                    [BGP/170] 07:43:20, localpref 2000
                      AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
                    > to 10.110.0.12 via ae1.405

So, router-A doesn't start propagate blackhole route to UPLINK-A (because it is 
not the best, i guess) and DDOS still came from UPLINK-A.

How can i handle this situation? Maybe set lower route preference from 
detection appliance than default 170? But "Directly connected network" has 
preference 0 and i cannot go lower and cannot get more specific than local /32. 
Or maybe use bgp advertise-inactive toward my UPLINKs? Will this help?

Thanks!

Daniel
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to